Skip to main content
Waco3 · 2020ux

Understanding how creatives create proposals

Researching and understanding the business needs of the creative community

Roles
UX Researcher
Duration
4 weeks
Year
2020
UX ResearchPersonasInterviews
Tools
  • Google Docs
  • Google Sheets
  • Google Meet
  • Figma
Understanding how creatives create proposals

Streamlining proposal creation for creatives

Background

As a designer, the business side was the part nobody trained me for. University covered the design work — quoting clients, writing proposals, and pricing services were not on the syllabus. It took me years of trial and error to figure out how to put a real proposal together.

Problem statement

Quoting is the slow, dull part of every project. The proposal is also the first thing the client sees. Designers usually pick between a fast plain Excel sheet or a slow, beautiful Adobe document. I went looking for something that gave me both — fast and good-looking, built for creatives — and nothing existed.

Existing tools are outdated and generic. There are almost no templates built for the Latin American (Spanish) market, so proposals end up taking longer than they should and looking like everyone else's. The other thing missing in most of them: a clear way to spell out the project boundaries so clients actually know what's in scope.

Goal of the research

Understand what emerging creatives and freelancers in Latin America actually struggle with when they put a quote together — and where a better tool could save them time. The focus is people early in their careers, where the gap between design school and running a business is widest.

Competitive research

I started by mapping the quoting and invoicing tools out there, mostly in Spanish, with an eye on a few English-language ones worth comparing against.

Highly rated tools

GetBillage is full-featured invoicing with clean workflows and good mobile. Sage is the heaviest of the three — built for power users who want serious accounting. Debitoor combines invoicing and expense tracking in one straightforward dashboard.

Mid-range performers

FacturasCloud, AcentoCoop, Canva, Anfix, Billin.net, and Holded all sit in the middle. Each does the job, with very different ideas about what 'good design' means. Canva is the odd one out: it's a graphic design tool that happens to invoice — the documents look great, but the workflow isn't really built for it.

Lower-ranked tools

GetQuipu, ContaSimple, Nomo, TPVGratuito, ContaMoney, Gespymes, and ContaAutonomos all rank lower. Same set of problems across the group: dated interfaces, awkward workflows, weak mobile support, and not much help when you get stuck.

Key takeaways

Mobile is table stakes

Almost every top-ranked tool has solid iOS/Android support. Web-only is a flag that you are looking at an older product.

UI is the ranking

The tools that rank well are the ones that get the workflow out of the way. Feature depth without UI care is not enough.

Support is part of the product

Live chat, knowledge bases, and active community show up consistently in the higher-ranked group. People stay where they can get unstuck.

Where the bottom group falls short

Outdated visuals and slow, clunky workflows. The fix is unglamorous: redo the basics.

Mid-tier is crowded

Most of the mid-range looks the same and does the same things. A clear point of view, or design that actually fits the user, is enough to stand out.

The opening

Nothing in this set is built for Latin American creatives. That is a real, underserved audience.

The research plan

Objective: Understand how creatives in Latin America currently quote and where it hurts, and test whether a web app could meaningfully help.

Target audience: People aged 20 to 45 — designers, creatives, musicians, freelancers, and gig workers across Latin America.

Participant search strategy

Telegram groups

Tried, got nowhere. Nobody volunteered.

Facebook groups

Three responses. Not enough to draw conclusions from.

Professional recruitment

Hired a local agency — that's where the seven interviewees came from.

Prescreening

I wanted creatives or freelancers who already wrote their own proposals. The pre-screen captured experience, specialization, and location so I could confirm fit before the interview.

2 Junior Designers

1–3 years of experience. No specific specialization.

3 Medium-Level Designers

3–5 years experience. Print, social media, logo design.

2 Senior Designers

5+ years experience. Branding and web design.

1 Musician

Specialized in DJing and music production.

1 Video Editor

Focused on video editing.

1 Senior Video Producer

Extensive experience in video editing and production.

Interview questions

I used the same questionnaire across every interview. The questions stayed focused on how each person actually works through a proposal — the steps, the friction, and what they wish they had.

Interview questionnaire

Summary of the interviews

Junior designers

Junior · Design

Medium designer

Mid-level · Design

Senior designers

Senior · Design

Video producer

Video

Musician

Music

Empathy map

The empathy map pulls together what creatives think, feel, and care about during the proposal process. Putting it on a single page made it easier to design with their actual experience in mind, not an idealized version of it.

Empathy map

Scenario development

I built a day-in-the-life scenario of a video editor from the interview material. A specific story moved stakeholders past abstract user descriptions and into the real context — the time pressure, the workflow, the moments where a proposal stalls a project.

A day in the life of a video professional
Meet Valentina
Multiple projects
Valentina's schedule
Tools Valentina uses
Valentina's struggles
Networking
About the scenario
Download the full scenario (PDF)

Research results

What the research surfaced

Six themes from the interviews, each one shaping what Waco3.io eventually became.

  1. How they quote today

    Most respondents quote in Excel with a personal template. A few use email, WhatsApp, Illustrator, or InDesign instead.

  2. The toolset

    Excel, InDesign, Illustrator, Word, email, WhatsApp — different combinations for different people, no shared standard.

  3. Where it gets hard

    Estimating how long a project takes. Pinning down the specifics with the client. Building each new quote from scratch.

  4. What it costs them

    Hours per quote, plus the financial hit when an underscoped one slips into the actual project.

  5. What they want

    Something more professional-looking than Excel, but faster than Illustrator or InDesign.

  6. Other things that came up

    Quotes that look good, less time spent making them, and better back-and-forth with the client during negotiation.

Visit Waco3.io
Other work

Explore more case studies