Understanding how creatives create proposals
Researching and understanding the business needs of the creative community
- Roles
- UX Researcher
- Duration
- 4 weeks
- Year
- 2020
Google Docs
Google Sheets
Google Meet
Figma

Streamlining proposal creation for creatives
Background
As a designer, the business side was the part nobody trained me for. University covered the design work — quoting clients, writing proposals, and pricing services were not on the syllabus. It took me years of trial and error to figure out how to put a real proposal together.
Problem statement
Quoting is the slow, dull part of every project. The proposal is also the first thing the client sees. Designers usually pick between a fast plain Excel sheet or a slow, beautiful Adobe document. I went looking for something that gave me both — fast and good-looking, built for creatives — and nothing existed.
Existing tools are outdated and generic. There are almost no templates built for the Latin American (Spanish) market, so proposals end up taking longer than they should and looking like everyone else's. The other thing missing in most of them: a clear way to spell out the project boundaries so clients actually know what's in scope.
Goal of the research
Understand what emerging creatives and freelancers in Latin America actually struggle with when they put a quote together — and where a better tool could save them time. The focus is people early in their careers, where the gap between design school and running a business is widest.
Competitive research
I started by mapping the quoting and invoicing tools out there, mostly in Spanish, with an eye on a few English-language ones worth comparing against.
Highly rated tools
GetBillage is full-featured invoicing with clean workflows and good mobile. Sage is the heaviest of the three — built for power users who want serious accounting. Debitoor combines invoicing and expense tracking in one straightforward dashboard.
Mid-range performers
FacturasCloud, AcentoCoop, Canva, Anfix, Billin.net, and Holded all sit in the middle. Each does the job, with very different ideas about what 'good design' means. Canva is the odd one out: it's a graphic design tool that happens to invoice — the documents look great, but the workflow isn't really built for it.
Lower-ranked tools
GetQuipu, ContaSimple, Nomo, TPVGratuito, ContaMoney, Gespymes, and ContaAutonomos all rank lower. Same set of problems across the group: dated interfaces, awkward workflows, weak mobile support, and not much help when you get stuck.
Key takeaways
Mobile is table stakes
Almost every top-ranked tool has solid iOS/Android support. Web-only is a flag that you are looking at an older product.
UI is the ranking
The tools that rank well are the ones that get the workflow out of the way. Feature depth without UI care is not enough.
Support is part of the product
Live chat, knowledge bases, and active community show up consistently in the higher-ranked group. People stay where they can get unstuck.
Where the bottom group falls short
Outdated visuals and slow, clunky workflows. The fix is unglamorous: redo the basics.
Mid-tier is crowded
Most of the mid-range looks the same and does the same things. A clear point of view, or design that actually fits the user, is enough to stand out.
The opening
Nothing in this set is built for Latin American creatives. That is a real, underserved audience.
The research plan
Objective: Understand how creatives in Latin America currently quote and where it hurts, and test whether a web app could meaningfully help.
Target audience: People aged 20 to 45 — designers, creatives, musicians, freelancers, and gig workers across Latin America.
Participant search strategy
Telegram groups
Tried, got nowhere. Nobody volunteered.
Facebook groups
Three responses. Not enough to draw conclusions from.
Professional recruitment
Hired a local agency — that's where the seven interviewees came from.
Prescreening
I wanted creatives or freelancers who already wrote their own proposals. The pre-screen captured experience, specialization, and location so I could confirm fit before the interview.
2 Junior Designers
1–3 years of experience. No specific specialization.
3 Medium-Level Designers
3–5 years experience. Print, social media, logo design.
2 Senior Designers
5+ years experience. Branding and web design.
1 Musician
Specialized in DJing and music production.
1 Video Editor
Focused on video editing.
1 Senior Video Producer
Extensive experience in video editing and production.
Interview questions
I used the same questionnaire across every interview. The questions stayed focused on how each person actually works through a proposal — the steps, the friction, and what they wish they had.
Summary of the interviews
Empathy map
The empathy map pulls together what creatives think, feel, and care about during the proposal process. Putting it on a single page made it easier to design with their actual experience in mind, not an idealized version of it.
Scenario development
I built a day-in-the-life scenario of a video editor from the interview material. A specific story moved stakeholders past abstract user descriptions and into the real context — the time pressure, the workflow, the moments where a proposal stalls a project.
Research results
What the research surfaced
Six themes from the interviews, each one shaping what Waco3.io eventually became.
How they quote today
Most respondents quote in Excel with a personal template. A few use email, WhatsApp, Illustrator, or InDesign instead.
The toolset
Excel, InDesign, Illustrator, Word, email, WhatsApp — different combinations for different people, no shared standard.
Where it gets hard
Estimating how long a project takes. Pinning down the specifics with the client. Building each new quote from scratch.
What it costs them
Hours per quote, plus the financial hit when an underscoped one slips into the actual project.
What they want
Something more professional-looking than Excel, but faster than Illustrator or InDesign.
Other things that came up
Quotes that look good, less time spent making them, and better back-and-forth with the client during negotiation.
Explore more case studies
Waco3.ioAI-Powered Proposal Platform
Full-stack SaaS with AI proposal generation, RAG pipeline, LangGraph agents, client analytics, Stripe integration, and session recordings.
ReactZeroZero-Dependency Component Libraries
4 accessible React primitives shipped to npm: combobox (ARIA 1.2), datepicker (WCAG 2.1 AA), animation orchestration, and cell-first data grid. All zero-dependency.
Dispatcher Dashboard Redesign
Cut load-scanning time by 10x with a custom card-based table layout. Research with 5 dispatchers, responsive design.